Wednesday 12 September 2007 2:05:47 am
Andre, as far as I know, the statement: only subtree_expiry will 'will implicitly turn on the "ignore_content_expiry" and set the expiration time to zero.' is not quite true, as you can see here: http://issues.ez.no/IssueView.php?Id=8817
I don't know if the eZ cache mechanism has changed since then, but if it's not, then the documentation is wrong (which was noticed in the bug comment, but no one changed the docs). As far as I know, you have to explicitly set ignore_content_expiry and expiry=0 when using subtree_expiry. To avoid further confusion, could someone from the eZ crew check how really cache-blocks works with subtree_expiry, and correct the documentation if needed?
--
Nothing is impossible. Not if you can imagine it!
Hubert Farnsworth
|