|
Thursday 16 December 2010 1:33:53 am
Not giving up on this topic guys.. The permission (p1) allows all anonymous users to read all objects, no limitations (referred to from now as p1) If i create a new permission (p2) which allows only a certcain subtree to be read only if the object state = proofread will p2 be taken into account or will p1 which is effectively more liberal ignore p2 ? I have created a new section for testing purposes called "Restricted Access" (referred to as r1) Experiment If i change so that p1 excludes content in r1 i seem to be able to have p2 honored. p2 in this case is configured so that all elements within a certain subtree with a section r1 and object_state = proofread can be read by anonymous users. I have also experienced issues with the fact that the subtree is ignored in the permission listing, but i am not sure if the code actually ignores the subtree limitation. (subtree bug is not a biggy for me, but should be fixed) Please guys any respons to this problem?
|
